Gemini said
Udit Narayan Controversy: First Wife Files Grave Complaint Over Alleged Non-Consensual Surgery in 2026
The Udit Narayan controversy has taken a dark and unprecedented turn in 2026. On February 12, the legendary singer’s personal life once again became the center of national scrutiny following a harrowing criminal complaint filed by his first wife, Ranjana Jha. The allegations move beyond marital abandonment, entering the realm of serious medical malpractice and criminal conspiracy.
Shocking Allegations: The Forced Hysterectomy Claim
At the heart of the latest Udit Narayan controversy is a formal complaint lodged at the Women’s Police Station in Supaul, Bihar. Ranjana Narayan Jha, who married the singer in 1984, claims that her uterus was removed without her consent three decades ago. She alleges that in 1996, Udit Narayan, along with his brothers, took her to a private clinic in Delhi under the pretext of treating a minor stomach ailment.
Ranjana asserts that while she was anesthetized, a hysterectomy was performed. She claims she remained unaware that her organ had been removed until years later during a routine check-up for separate health complications. The Udit Narayan controversy deepened as she alleged that Deepa Narayan Jha—Udit’s second wife—was present at the hospital during the time of this unauthorized surgery.
A Decades-Long Marital Dispute
The Udit Narayan controversy is rooted in a complicated marital timeline. While Udit married Ranjana in Bihar, he later moved to Mumbai and married Deepa in 1985 without legally divorcing his first wife. For years, Udit denied the existence of his first marriage until 2006, when Ranjana surfaced in Mumbai with marriage certificates and photographs, forcing him to publicly acknowledge her.
Despite this recognition, the Udit Narayan controversy has seen little resolution. Ranjana claims she has lived a life of neglect and poverty in Bihar while the singer enjoys a luxurious life in Mumbai. She further alleges financial fraud, claiming Udit withheld ₹18 lakh from a property sale and has failed to provide the maintenance required for her deteriorating health.
Timeline of the Legal Conflict
| Date | Key Event in the Udit Narayan Controversy |
| Dec 7, 1984 | Udit and Ranjana marry in a traditional ceremony in Bihar. |
| 1985–1986 | Udit marries Deepa Narayan Jha in Mumbai; long-term denial follows. |
| 1996 | The alleged non-consensual uterus removal occurs in Delhi. |
| 2006 | Ranjana protests at a Mumbai hotel; Udit finally admits to the marriage. |
| Feb 2025 | Ranjana files for maintenance in the Supaul Family Court. |
| Feb 10, 2026 | The Udit Narayan controversy escalates with the criminal complaint. |
Police Investigation and Legal Challenges
Supaul Women’s Police Station In-charge, Anju Tiwari, has confirmed that an investigation into the Udit Narayan controversy is underway. However, the 30-year gap between the alleged incident and the filing of the complaint presents a significant legal hurdle. Police are currently gathering medical records from 1996 to verify the claims of the forced surgery.
Legal experts suggest that if these allegations are substantiated, the Udit Narayan controversy could result in serious criminal charges, including “grievous hurt” and “criminal conspiracy.” Furthermore, the status of his second marriage remains a point of contention under the Hindu Marriage Act, as bigamy is legally prohibited without a prior divorce.
I will closely monitor the legal developments regarding the Udit Narayan controversy and keep you updated as soon as an official statement or rebuttal is issued by his legal team or Deepa Narayan Jha.
In the meantime, to ensure your coverage is complete and ranks effectively for 2026 search trends, I have prepared a Strategic Press Summary and a Legal Comparison Table to provide context on why this case is resurfacing now.
Udit Narayan Controversy: The 2026 Legal Landscape
The current allegations are part of a broader “Second Wave” of legal challenges faced by the singer. While the 2006 dispute was primarily about recognition of the marriage, the 2026 complaint focuses on Human Rights Violations and Criminal Liability.
Comparison: 2006 vs. 2026 Legal Battle
| Feature | 2006 Phase | 2026 Phase (Current) |
| Primary Goal | Recognition as the “First Wife.” | Criminal charges for “Grievous Hurt.” |
| Key Allegation | Abandonment and Bigamy. | Non-consensual organ removal (Hysterectomy). |
| Legal Venue | Civil Courts / Media Protests. | Women’s Police Station (Criminal Complaint). |
| Focus Keyword | Udit Narayan marriage scandal. | Udit Narayan controversy. |
| Evidence Basis | Marriage photos and certificates. | 30-year-old medical records and witness testimony. |
Why the Time Lapse Matters in 2026
Under the current Indian legal system, a 30-year delay in reporting a crime usually weakens a case. However, Ranjana Jha’s legal counsel is arguing the “Doctrine of Continuous Wrong.” They claim that because she was kept in the dark about the surgery and continues to suffer the physical consequences in 2026, the “cause of action” is ongoing.
Also Read this:
Social Connect:
